Family relations in the age of social media: How Jordanians view the influence of Facebook and WhatsApp
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of social media platforms, particularly Facebook and WhatsApp, on family life and marital relationships in Jordan, with attention to their potential link to rising divorce rates. The research addresses a growing concern about how digital communication technologies affect trust, cohesion, and everyday family interactions. A quantitative survey was conducted with 100 married participants residing in Amman, Jordan. Data were collected using structured questionnaires designed to capture perceptions of spousal trust, relationship quality, and family dynamics in relation to social media use. The findings reveal that while most respondents acknowledged the negative impact of Facebook and WhatsApp on spousal communication and family cohesion, perceptions of trust were more complex. Specifically, 72% reported no strengthening of marital bonds through social media use, yet 82% did not believe mistrust had increased. Participants attributed this to shared cultural, religious, and ethical values that reinforced marital trust. Nonetheless, over half observed that excessive time on social media disrupted face-to-face communication, family mealtimes, and overall cohesion. In conclusion, social media use among Jordanian families presents a double-edged sword: while enabling global connectivity and access to diverse perspectives, it also risks weakening intimate communication and contributing to marital discord. These findings highlight the need for further research into cultural, generational, and psychological dimensions of social media use, particularly its impact on children and long-term family stability.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
References
Abbasi, I.S., & Alghamdi, N.G. (2017). When Flirting Turns Into Infidelity: The Facebook Dilemma. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 45:1, 1-14, DOI: 10.1080/01926187.2016.1277804.
Abu-Shanab, E,. and Al-Tarawneh, H. (2013). How Jordanian Youth Perceive Social Networks' Influence? Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260870248_How_Jordanian_Youth_Perceive_Social_ Networks Influence.
Al-Abbas, L., Haider, A. S., & Hussein, R. F. (2020). Google autocomplete search algorithms and the Arabs’ perspectives on gender: A case study of Google Egypt’. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 20(4), 95-112. doi:https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2004-06
Al Bader, K, (2012). The pattern of social values and its relationship with the Saudi trends toward social networking sites: A survey on both parents and children generations in Reiiad city.
Al-Khaddam, H (2013). Impact of Social Networks on Interpersonal Communication of the Students, University College Irbid Girls: Facebook as a Model.
Al-Shehri, S. (2013). An outlook on future mobile learning in Saudi Arabia. QScience Proceedings, 2013(3), 9.
Ayish, M., & Mellor, N. (2015). Reporting in the MENA region: Cyber engagement and pan-Arab social media. Rowman & Littlefield.
Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet Society: The internet in everyday life. London: Sage.
Brennen, BS. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies. New York and London: Routledge.
Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (1974). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III.
Buckingham, D. (2008). Youth, Identity, And Digital Media. London: The MIT Press.
Buckingham, D. (2006). Children and New Media. In: Lievrouw, L., and Livingstone, S. The Handbook of New Media: Updated Student Edition. pp. 75 – 91. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Carter, Z. A. (2016). Married and Previously Married Men and Women’s Perceptions of Communication on Facebook with the Opposite Sex: How Communicating Through Facebook Can Be Damaging to Marriages. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 57:1, 36-55, DOI: 10.1080/10502556.2015.1113816.
Chandler, D., and Munday, R. (2011). Dictionary of Media and Communication. London: Oxford University Press.
Chow, T. S., & Wan, H. Y. (2017). Is there any 'Facebook Depression'? Exploring the moderating roles of neuroticism, Facebook social comparison, and envy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.032
Cravens, J. D., & Whiting, J. B. (2014). Clinical implications of internet infidelity: Where Facebook fits in. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 42(4), 325-339.
Cravens, J. D., & Whiting, J. B. (2016). Fooling Around on Facebook: The Perceptions of Infidelity Behaviour on Social Networking Sites. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 15:3, 213-231, DOI: 10.1080/15332691.2014.1003670.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Polity: UK.
Deuze, M, (2012). Media Life. Polity Press: UK.
Doughty, S. (2015). Facebook and Twitter are a threat to marriages: Social media is now a factor in one in seven divorces. Daily Mail, [Online], 30 April. (Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3061616/Facebook-Twitter-factor-one-seven- divorces.html.
Ess, C, (2014). Digital Media Ethics. 2nd ed. Polity Press: USA, UK.
Eyadat, Y, (2016). Status of WhatsApp application usage by the information technology and computer science students at Yarmouk University in Jordan. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305688335.
Fortner, R., and Fackler, P. (2014). The Handbook of Media and Mass Communication Theory. UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Greenfield, S. (2014). Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. New York: Random House.
Haider, A. S., & Al-Abbas, L. S. (2022). Stereotyping Arab women in jokes circulated on social media during the coronavirus crisis. The European Journal of Humour Research, 10(1), 168-185. doi:10.7592/EJHR2022.10.1.569
Hartmann, M (2005). The discourse of the perfect Future – Young People and New Technologies. In Silverstone, R. Media, Technology, And Everyday Life In Europe. 1st ed. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate.
Havey, A., and Puccio, D. (2016). Sex, Likes, and Social Media: Talking to our teens in the digital age. UK: Penguin Random House.
Hurst, N. (2013). Excessive Facebook Use Can Damage Relationships, MU Study Finds. Munews
Internet World Stats (2017). Internet Usage in the Middle East: Middle East Internet Usage and Population Statistics.
Jordan, N. A., Russell, L., Afousi, E., Chemel, T., McVicker, M., Robertson, J., & Winek, J. (2014). The ethical use of social media in marriage and family therapy: Recommendations and future directions. The Family Journal, 22(1), 105-112.
John, R. (2010). SURVEY QUESTION BANK: Methods Fact Sheet (2010) pp. 1-11. Available from: https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/262829/discover_likertfactsheet.pdf. (Download on 29 April 2017).
Lewis, A., Knight, T., Germaanov, G., Benstead, M., Joseph, C., and Poole, L. (2015). The impact on Family functioning of social media use by depressed adolescents: a qualitative analysis of the family options study. Front. Psychiatry, 23 September 2015. Available from: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00131/full.
Madianou, M, & Miller, D, (2012). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2) 169 –187.
McQuail, D. (2011). Mass communication theory (6th ed.). London: Sage.
Miller, D. (2016). Social media in an English village (p. 220). UCL Press.
Miller, D. (2017). An extreme reading of Facebook. Cosmopolitics, 319.
Martin, R., & Creeber, G. (Eds.). (2009). Digital Cultures. Open University Press
Maseruka, H. (2014). New Media, Old Concerns: What are the Effects of Smartphones on Teenagers’ Social & Cultural Interactions?
McCorkindale, T., and DiStaso, M W. (2014). The State of Social Media Research: Where Are We Now, Where We Were, and What It Means for Public Relations. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations. Vol. 1, No. 1.
Nadler, J. T., Weston, R. & Voyles, E.C. (2015). Stuck in the Middle: The Use and Interpretation of Mid-Points in Items on Questionnaires. The Journal of General Psychology Vol. 142 , Iss. 2, 2015.
Ofcom, (2016). The Communications Market Report. Available at: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/ data/assets/pdf_file/0010/17020/bitesize.pdf.
O’Keeffe, G., and Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). Clinical Report – The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families.
Perse, E. (2014). Uses and Gratifications. Available from: http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756841/obo- 9780199756841-0132.xml.
Preston, C.C., & Colman, A.M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica 104 (2000) 1-15.
Quan-Haase, A., and Young, A. (2014). The Uses and Gratifications (U&G) Approach as a Lens for Studying Social Media Practice. In: Fortner, R., and Fackler, P. eds., The Handbook of Media and Mass Communication Theory. pp. 269 – 286. UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
Rosengren, K. (1974). “Uses and Gratifications: A Paradigm Outlined.” In: Blumler, J., & Katz,
E. (Eds.), The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research,
pp. 269–86. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Rossi, E. (2002). Uses and Gratifications/ Dependency Theory. Available from: http://zimmer.csufresno.edu/~johnca/spch100/7-4-uses.htm.
Silverstone, R. (2005). Media, Technology, And Everyday Life In Europe. 1st ed. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate.
Shbaikat, G. (2006). Social trends in Jordan. Amman: DOS.
Villegas, A. (2013). The Influence of Technology on Family Dynamics. Proceedings of the New York State Communication Association: Vol. 2012, Article 10. Available at: http://docs.rwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1062&context=nyscaproceedings.
Whitner, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041