The structure of Indonesian mimetic process: A natural semantic metalanguage analysis

Main Article Content

Siti Ayu Nurhidayati
Mulyadi
T. Thyrhaya Zein
Dardanila

Abstract

This research aims to describe Indonesian mimetic process, and its original meaning. This study used descriptive qualitative method. The data were collected through listening and recording techniques.  The findings obtained from this research are that Indonesian mimetic process verbs refer to the universal lexicon of word roots: HAPPEN and DO. The semantic structure of Indonesian mimetic process verbs has 1) event subtypes with event sub-subtypes (ups ‘keliru/mistaken’, nahhhh ‘setuju/agree’, cling... ‘menjadi bagus/be good’, deru ‘air yang meluap/water overflowing’, huuu ‘membuat api membesar/make the fire bigger’, sstt... ‘rahasia/secret’, gemoy ‘menggemaskan/adorable’, ohhh ‘menghibur diri/amuse yourself’) event subtype with bodily process subtypes (nyam nyam ‘kenyang/full’, brrr...brrr ‘sakit/pain’, wk wk `tertawa sinis/cynical laugh', zzzz ‘bermimpi/dream’, nih ‘kesal/annoyed’); 2) non-agentive movement subtype (cring ‘mendapat gaji buta/got a blind salary’). Indonesian mimetic process verbs ups ‘keliru/mistaken’, deru 'air yang meluap/water overflowing', huuu ‘membuat api membesar/make the fire grow’ have purposive factors and no desirability.  Indonesian mimetic process verbs nahhhh ‘setuju/agree’, cling ‘menjadi bagus/be good’, sttt ‘rahasia/secret’, gemoy 'menggemaskan/adorable‘, ohhh 'menghibur diri/entertain yourself’, nyam-nyam ‘kenyang/full’, wkwk 'tertawa sinis/laugh sarcastically', zzzz ‘bermimpi/dream’, cring ‘mendapat gaji buta/get a blind salary’ have purposive factors and no desire. The Indonesian mimetic process verb brrr...brrr ‘sakit/pain’ has no purposive factor and desire.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurhidayati, S. A., Mulyadi, Zein, T. T., & Dardanila. (2025). The structure of Indonesian mimetic process: A natural semantic metalanguage analysis. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/vsmp3142
Section
Literature, Linguistics & Criticism

How to Cite

Nurhidayati, S. A., Mulyadi, Zein, T. T., & Dardanila. (2025). The structure of Indonesian mimetic process: A natural semantic metalanguage analysis. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/vsmp3142

Share

References

Akita, K. (2009). A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of Japanese mimetics. Kobe University.

Akita, K. (2016). Mimetics. Walter de Gruyter Inc.

Akita, K. & P. P. (eds. ). (2019). Ideophones, mimetics and expressives. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Andrason&Heine. (2023). On the grammaticalization of ideophones. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Armoskaite, S. & P. K. (eds. ). (2017). Structuring sensory imagery: Ideophones across languages and cultures. Special Issue of Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 62(2).

Barrett, dkk. (2014). Introduction: Ideophones: Between Grammar and Poetry. Pragmatics and Society, Volume 5(Issue 3), 335–340.

Chafe, W. L. (1970). Meaning and the Structure of Language. 1st Ed. University of Chicago Press.

Choksi&Badenoch. (2021). Expressives in the South Asian Linguistic Area. Brill.

Dingemanse, M. (2011). Ezra Pound among the Mawu: Ideophones and Iconicity in Siwu. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in the Cross-Linguistic Study of Ideophones. Linguistics and Language Compass, 6(10), 654–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.361

Dingemanse, M. (2017). Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF - Sprachtypologie Und Universalienforschung, 70(2), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2017-0018

Dingemanse, M. (2019). Chapter 1. ‘Ideophone’ as a comparative concept. 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16.02din

Dingemanse, M., & Akita, K. (2017). An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, 53(3), 501–532. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222671600030X

Fitriana, I. (2021). Bangun Leksikon Mimetik Bahasa Jepang. Universitas Udayana Denpasar.

Goddard, C. (2012). Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics, 50(3), 711–743. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0022

Haiman, J. (2018). Ideophones and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge University Press.

Hinton dkk. (2001). Sound Symbolic Processes. Cambridge University Press.

Kageyama&Saito. (2016). Vocabulary Strata and Word Formation Processes. Walter de Gruyter Inc.

McLean, B. (2021). Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology, 25(3), 507–549. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2063

Mulyadi. (1998). Struktur Semantis Verba Bahasa Indonesia. Universitas Udayana Denpasar.

Mulyadi. (2009). Kategori dan Peran Semantis Verba dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Logat: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra.

Mulyadi. (2012). Emotion Verbs in Bahasa Indonesia and Asahan Malay. E-Journal of Linguistics, 5, 1–19.

Nuckolls, J. B. (1999). The Case for Sound Symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 225–252.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Sudipa, I. N. (2010). Struktur Semantik Verba Keadaan Bahasa. Udayana University Press.

Sujianto&, & Dahidi, A. (2004). Pengantar linguistik bahasa Jepang. Kesaint Blanc.

Thompson, A. L., & Do, Y. (2019). Defining iconicity: An articulation-based methodology for explaining the phonological structure of ideophones. Glossa, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/GJGL.872

Voeltz&Kilian-Hatz. (2008). Ideophones. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Wierzbicka, A. (2012). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford University Press.