Strategic management model of the learning environment in the era of digital transformation: Empirical studies in Indonesian educational institutions

Main Article Content

Nunuk Indarti
Sumarni
Bagus Hary Prakoso
Wahid Khozin
Lisadiyah
Farida Hanun
Herlinawati
Imran Siregar
Iyoh Mastiyah
Onok Yayang Pamungkas

Abstract

This article examines the strategic management model of the language learning environment in the era of digital transformation with a focus on the role of educators and institutional governance in Indonesia. The study used cross-sectional quantitative design at 240 institutions in 31 provinces, including junior high schools, high schools/vocational schools, and colleges. Key variables include institutional strategy maturity, educator digital competencies, AI utilization, and LMS adoption. The outcome is an increase in standardized language proficiency at the institutional level. The descriptive results showed an average strategy maturity of 1.99/5, digital competence of 64.57/100, an infrastructure index of 0.664/1, and LMS adoption of 16.7%. The leaning OLS model explains ≈62% variation in outcomes. The largest contribution comes from digital competence and the use of AI, followed by the direct effect of strategy maturity. The mediation analysis showed that part of the influence of the strategy flowed through digital competencies and AI practices, while the moderation test showed that the strategy effect was stronger in urban institutions than in semi-urban and rural. Robustness checks (HC3-robust SE, specification curve, winsorizing/trimming, and leave-one-province-out) confirm the coefficient stability and smallness of ΔR² between specifications. The findings confirm that a clear strategy architecture, educators' digital competence, and an adequate analytics ecosystem are prerequisites for reaping the academic impact of language learning technologies. The practical implications emphasize policy priorities on strengthening teachers' digital competencies, curriculum-based AI/LMS orchestration, as well as improving the conditions of data facilitation and governance, especially to bridge the gap between regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Indarti, N., Sumarni, Prakoso, B. H., Khozin, W., Lisadiyah, Hanun, F., Herlinawati, Siregar, I., Mastiyah, I., & Pamungkas, O. Y. (2026). Strategic management model of the learning environment in the era of digital transformation: Empirical studies in Indonesian educational institutions. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.58256/28q6gc22
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Indarti, N., Sumarni, Prakoso, B. H., Khozin, W., Lisadiyah, Hanun, F., Herlinawati, Siregar, I., Mastiyah, I., & Pamungkas, O. Y. (2026). Strategic management model of the learning environment in the era of digital transformation: Empirical studies in Indonesian educational institutions. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.58256/28q6gc22

Share

References

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.

Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Chen, J., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G.-J. (2024). Effects of learning analytics-based feedback on students’ SRL and achievement in blended learning. System, 123, 103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103388

Chen, M., & Cui, Y. (2022). Effects of automated writing evaluation and peer feedback on cohesion and coherence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 57, 100915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100915

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design (5th ed.). SAGE.

Cukurova, M., Kent, C., et al. (2024). The interplay of learning, analytics, and artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13384

Dizon, G. (2024). ChatGPT as a tool for self-directed foreign language learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2413406

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Geng, X., Chai, C. S., et al. (2023). Using learning analytics to investigate learning processes in AR language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39, 1115–1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12760

Gray, G., Schalk, A. E., Cooke, G., Murnion, P., Rooney, P., & O’Rourke, K. C. (2022). Stakeholders’ insights on learning analytics: Perspectives of students and staff. Computers & Education, 187, 104550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104550

Hashim, M. A. M., & Kasim, S. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1

Hasumi, T., et al. (2024). Technology-enhanced language learning: A bibliometric perspective. Cogent Education, 11, 2346044. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2346044

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Routledge.

Karatay, Y., & Karatay, L. (2024). Automated writing evaluation in L2 classrooms: A research synthesis. System, 123, 103332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103332

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. Routledge.

Li, B. (2024). A systematic review of the first year of publications on ChatGPT in language learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100209

Li, B. (2024). Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students’ performance. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100219

Liu, Y., & Chen, X. (2025). The effectiveness of learning analytics-based interventions: A meta-analysis. SAGE Open, 15(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251336707

Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Free Press.

Ngo, T. T. N., et al. (2022). A three-level meta-analysis of automated writing evaluation in EFL/ESL. Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2096642

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). Publications Office of the EU/JRC.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Sari, E., & Han, T. (2024). The impact of automated writing evaluation on self-efficacy, self-regulation, anxiety, and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40, 2065–2080. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13004

Sawiji, H., et al. (2024). Determining factors influencing teachers’ intention to use web-based e-learning in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2355830. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2355830

Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline (rev. ed.). Doubleday.

Shi, H., & Aryadoust, V. (2024). AI-based automated written feedback in language education: A systematic review. ReCALL, 36, 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000265

Uzun, Y., et al. (2025). Engagement with analytics feedback and SRL. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00515-3

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167

Weidlich, J., et al. (2025). Highly informative feedback using learning analytics. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00539-9

Zhu, M., & Wang, C. (2025). A systematic review of AI in language education: Current status and future implications. Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.10125/73606

Zhuang, Y., et al. (2025). Generative AI for picture-cued writing. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100906