From cosmic reorientation to scientific culture: Reinterpreting the scientific revolution through historical analysis and functional modelling
Main Article Content
Abstract
Between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, European approaches to nature were reorganised through mathematical astronomy, instrument-based observation, experiment, and new expectations about evidence. This article revisits that transformation without treating it as an instantaneous victory of modern reason over a uniformly medieval past. Instead, it interprets the Scientific Revolution as a layered process in which inherited philosophies, religious commitments, artisanal skill, print culture, patronage, commerce, and scholarly exchange interacted with changing scientific practices. The study combines historical analysis and source systematisation with IDEF0 functional modelling. The first model explains how varied primary and secondary materials can be converted into a coherent yet qualified historical interpretation through source mapping, contextualisation, critical evaluation, and synthesis. The second model shows how that interpretation can be translated into contemporary education through curriculum integration, interdisciplinary teaching, source-based inquiry, and connections to present scientific and ethical questions. The analysis indicates that the period changed more than particular theories: it altered how credible knowledge was produced, communicated, tested, and authorised. IDEF0 makes the analytical and educational sequence visible, but it is used as a heuristic framework rather than as a causal explanation of historical change. The study is limited by its predominantly European focus and by the conceptual, rather than classroom-tested, character of the models. Future research should broaden the geographical frame, develop digital and museum-based applications, and evaluate the educational model with learners and teachers.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Bacon, F. (2000). The New Organon (L. Jardine & M. Silverthorne, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1620).
Biagioli, M. (1993). Galileo, courtier: The practice of science in the culture of absolutism. University of Chicago Press.
Clough, M. P. (2011). The story behind the science: Bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20, 701-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9310-7
Cohen, H. F. (1994). The Scientific Revolution: A historiographical inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
Cook, H. J. (2007). Matters of exchange: Commerce, medicine, and science in the Dutch Golden Age. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300117967.001.0001
Copernicus, N. (1978). On the revolutions (E. Rosen, Trans.). Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1543).
Daston, L., & Park, K. (1998). Wonders and the order of nature, 1150-1750. Zone Books.
Galilei, G. (1989). Sidereus nuncius, or The sidereal messenger (A. Van Helden, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1610).
Gaukroger, S. (2006). The emergence of a scientific culture: Science and the shaping of modernity, 1210-1685. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296446.001.0001
Gibbons, D. W., & Witherell, P. W. (2024). A reference activity model for additive manufacturing: Powder bed fusion (NIST AMS 100-60). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-60
Harrison, P. (2015). The territories of science and religion. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226184517.001.0001
Höttecke, D., & Silva, C. C. (2011). Why implementing history and philosophy in school science education is a challenge: An analysis of obstacles. Science & Education, 20, 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9285-4
Kepler, J. (1992). New astronomy (W. H. Donahue, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1609).
Koyré, A. (1957). From the closed world to the infinite universe. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican Revolution: Planetary astronomy in the development of Western thought. Harvard University Press.
Matthews, M. R. (2014). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science (20th anniversary rev. and expanded ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123058
McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17, 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9081-y
Metz, D., Klassen, S., McMillan, B., Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2007). Building a foundation for the use of historical narratives. Science & Education, 16, 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9024-z
Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy. Science Education, 81(4), 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199707)81:4<405::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-G
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (1993). Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0) (FIPS PUB 183). U.S. Department of Commerce.
Newton, I. (1999). The Principia: Mathematical principles of natural philosophy (I. B. Cohen & A. Whitman, Trans.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1687).
Raj, K. (2007). Relocating modern science: Circulation and the construction of knowledge in South Asia and Europe, 1650-1900. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625310
Smith, P. H. (2004). The body of the artisan: Art and experience in the Scientific Revolution. University of Chicago Press.
Westman, R. S. (2011). The Copernican question: Prognostication, skepticism, and celestial order. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520948167