Language proficiency and literary competence as career capital: Employment, career mobility, and participation in the global economy—a critical literary review of english literature education
Main Article Content
Abstract
English literature programmes cultivate linguistic, interpretive, narrative, rhetorical, and cultural capacities whose professional value is frequently asserted but rarely explained with sufficient conceptual precision. Employability discourse tends either to translate literary study into generic ‘communication skills’ or to defend literature solely through its intrinsic humanistic value. Both positions obscure the more demanding question of how discipline-specific learning becomes usable and recognisable beyond the university. This structured conceptual review examines language proficiency and literary competence as potential forms of career capital for graduates of English literature education. A concept-led search, completed in August 2026, brought together scholarship on literary education, literary competence, graduate employability, career capital, transfer, professional identity, cultural inequality, narrative, and intercultural communication. The synthesis distinguishes possession of a capability from its conversion into opportunity. Close reading, contextual interpretation, narrative analysis, rhetorical judgement, evidence-based writing, and historically informed cultural understanding may support employment and career mobility, but they do not carry fixed labour-market value. Their conversion depends on professional articulation, applied experience, digital competence, networks, institutional reputation, employer recognition, and wider conditions of access. The review proposes a four-stage model linking disciplinary formation, capability formation, conversion mechanisms, and differentiated career outcomes. Seven propositions specify when literature-derived capabilities are likely to become portable career resources and when they remain professionally illegible. The analysis also rejects instrumental accounts that reduce literary study to workplace preparation: the discipline’s professional relevance arises partly from its sustained engagement with ambiguity, perspective, form, value, and contested meaning. Curricular implications therefore centre on making literary practices visible, providing credible settings for their application, and addressing unequal access to the resources through which graduates convert learning into employment, mobility, and global participation.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
Bathmaker, A.-M., Ingram, N., & Waller, R. (2013). Higher education, social class and the mobilisation of capitals: Recognising and playing the game. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5–6), 723–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.816041
Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2008). The social impact of the arts: An intellectual history. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227774
Best, S., & Marcus, S. (2009). Surface reading: An introduction. Representations, 108(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2009.108.1.1
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
Billett, S. (2009). Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802706561
Boje, D. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393432
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: Enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444347
Brown, P., Hesketh, A., & Williams, S. (2003). Employability in a knowledge-driven economy. Journal of Education and Work, 16(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363908032000070648
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/448619
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M., Gribkova, B., & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: A practical introduction for teachers. Council of Europe.
Carter, R. (2007). Literature and language teaching 1986–2006: A review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00130.x
Clarke, M. (2018). Rethinking graduate employability: The role of capital, individual attributes and context. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1923–1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1294152
Comunian, R., Jewell, S., Sunmoni, A., & Dent, T. (2023). For what it’s worth: European Arts & Humanities graduates’ employability and their engagement in society. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 22(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222231156892
Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. Cornell University Press.
Dacre Pool, L., & Sewell, P. (2007). The key to employability: Developing a practical model of graduate employability. Education + Training, 49(4), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910710754435
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). The identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization at institutions of higher education in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
DeFillippi, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150403
Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I. (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1713–1727. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000395
Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
Hall, G. (2015). Literature in language education (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137331847
Hanauer, D. I. (2001). The task of poetry reading and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 22(3), 295–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.3.295
Healy, M. (2023). Careers and employability learning: Pedagogical principles for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 48(8), 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2196997
Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238.x
Hinchliffe, G. W., & Jolly, A. (2011). Graduate employability and identity. British Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.482200
Holmes, L. (2001). Reconsidering graduate employability: The ‘graduate identity’ approach. Quality in Higher Education, 7(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320120060006
Holmes, L. (2013). Competing perspectives on graduate employability: Possession, position or process? Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 538–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.587140
Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667055
Jackson, D. (2015). Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and best practice. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842221
Jackson, D. (2016). Re-conceptualising graduate employability: The importance of pre-professional identity. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1139551
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2018). Reading literary fiction can improve theory of mind. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0408-2
Kramsch, C., & Kramsch, O. (2000). The avatars of literature in language study. The Modern Language Journal, 84(4), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00087
Kubota, R. (2011). Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.002
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x
Marginson, S. (2019). Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359823
McCowan, T. (2015). Should universities promote employability? Theory and Research in Education, 13(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515598060
McKay, S. (1982). Literature in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586470
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5
Moreau, M.-P., & Leathwood, C. (2006). Graduates’ employment and the discourse of employability: A critical analysis. Journal of Education and Work, 19(4), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080600867083
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press.
Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064
Paran, A. (2008). The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching: An evidence-based survey. Language Teaching, 41(4), 465–496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800520X
Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B., Gardner, B. G., & Motes, A. (2011). The sociology of storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150106
Rivera, L. A. (2011). Ivies, extracurriculars, and exclusion: Elite employers’ use of educational credentials. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2010.12.001
Small, H. (2013). The value of the humanities. Oxford University Press.
The British Academy. (2020). Qualified for the future: Quantifying demand for arts, humanities and social science skills. The British Academy.
Tomlinson, M. (2012). Graduate employability: A review of conceptual and empirical themes. Higher Education Policy, 25(4), 407–431. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2011.26
Tomlinson, M. (2017). Forms of graduate capital and their relationship to graduate employability. Education + Training, 59(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2016-0090
Trede, F., Macklin, R., & Bridges, D. (2012). Professional identity development: A review of the higher education literature. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.521237
Tymon, A. (2013). The student perspective on employability. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 841–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.604408
van Kuijk, I., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2018). The effect of reading a short passage of literary fiction on theory of mind: A replication of Kidd and Castano (2013). Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.117