Language proficiency and literary competence as career capital: Employment, career mobility, and participation in the global economy—a critical literary review of english literature education

Main Article Content

Ali Mohammad Ali Alasmar
Ibrahim Ali Altamimi

Abstract

English literature programmes cultivate linguistic, interpretive, narrative, rhetorical, and cultural capacities whose professional value is frequently asserted but rarely explained with sufficient conceptual precision. Employability discourse tends either to translate literary study into generic ‘communication skills’ or to defend literature solely through its intrinsic humanistic value. Both positions obscure the more demanding question of how discipline-specific learning becomes usable and recognisable beyond the university. This structured conceptual review examines language proficiency and literary competence as potential forms of career capital for graduates of English literature education. A concept-led search, completed in August 2026, brought together scholarship on literary education, literary competence, graduate employability, career capital, transfer, professional identity, cultural inequality, narrative, and intercultural communication. The synthesis distinguishes possession of a capability from its conversion into opportunity. Close reading, contextual interpretation, narrative analysis, rhetorical judgement, evidence-based writing, and historically informed cultural understanding may support employment and career mobility, but they do not carry fixed labour-market value. Their conversion depends on professional articulation, applied experience, digital competence, networks, institutional reputation, employer recognition, and wider conditions of access. The review proposes a four-stage model linking disciplinary formation, capability formation, conversion mechanisms, and differentiated career outcomes. Seven propositions specify when literature-derived capabilities are likely to become portable career resources and when they remain professionally illegible. The analysis also rejects instrumental accounts that reduce literary study to workplace preparation: the discipline’s professional relevance arises partly from its sustained engagement with ambiguity, perspective, form, value, and contested meaning. Curricular implications therefore centre on making literary practices visible, providing credible settings for their application, and addressing unequal access to the resources through which graduates convert learning into employment, mobility, and global participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Alasmar, A. M. A., & Altamimi, I. A. (2026). Language proficiency and literary competence as career capital: Employment, career mobility, and participation in the global economy—a critical literary review of english literature education. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.58256/7qem5k03
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Alasmar, A. M. A., & Altamimi, I. A. (2026). Language proficiency and literary competence as career capital: Employment, career mobility, and participation in the global economy—a critical literary review of english literature education. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.58256/7qem5k03

Share

References

Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612

Bathmaker, A.-M., Ingram, N., & Waller, R. (2013). Higher education, social class and the mobilisation of capitals: Recognising and playing the game. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5–6), 723–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.816041

Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2008). The social impact of the arts: An intellectual history. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227774

Best, S., & Marcus, S. (2009). Surface reading: An introduction. Representations, 108(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2009.108.1.1

Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9

Billett, S. (2009). Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802706561

Boje, D. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1), 106–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393432

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: Enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444347

Brown, P., Hesketh, A., & Williams, S. (2003). Employability in a knowledge-driven economy. Journal of Education and Work, 16(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363908032000070648

Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/448619

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.

Byram, M., Gribkova, B., & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: A practical introduction for teachers. Council of Europe.

Carter, R. (2007). Literature and language teaching 1986–2006: A review. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00130.x

Clarke, M. (2018). Rethinking graduate employability: The role of capital, individual attributes and context. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1923–1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1294152

Comunian, R., Jewell, S., Sunmoni, A., & Dent, T. (2023). For what it’s worth: European Arts & Humanities graduates’ employability and their engagement in society. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 22(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222231156892

Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. Cornell University Press.

Dacre Pool, L., & Sewell, P. (2007). The key to employability: Developing a practical model of graduate employability. Education + Training, 49(4), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910710754435

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). The identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization at institutions of higher education in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002

DeFillippi, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150403

Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I. (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1713–1727. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000395

Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005

Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701

Hall, G. (2015). Literature in language education (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137331847

Hanauer, D. I. (2001). The task of poetry reading and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 22(3), 295–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.3.295

Healy, M. (2023). Careers and employability learning: Pedagogical principles for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 48(8), 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2196997

Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238.x

Hinchliffe, G. W., & Jolly, A. (2011). Graduate employability and identity. British Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.482200

Holmes, L. (2001). Reconsidering graduate employability: The ‘graduate identity’ approach. Quality in Higher Education, 7(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320120060006

Holmes, L. (2013). Competing perspectives on graduate employability: Possession, position or process? Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 538–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.587140

Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667055

Jackson, D. (2015). Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and best practice. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842221

Jackson, D. (2016). Re-conceptualising graduate employability: The importance of pre-professional identity. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1139551

Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918

Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2018). Reading literary fiction can improve theory of mind. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0408-2

Kramsch, C., & Kramsch, O. (2000). The avatars of literature in language study. The Modern Language Journal, 84(4), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00087

Kubota, R. (2011). Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.002

Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x

Marginson, S. (2019). Limitations of human capital theory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359823

McCowan, T. (2015). Should universities promote employability? Theory and Research in Education, 13(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515598060

McKay, S. (1982). Literature in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586470

Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5

Moreau, M.-P., & Leathwood, C. (2006). Graduates’ employment and the discourse of employability: A critical analysis. Journal of Education and Work, 19(4), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080600867083

Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press.

Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002

Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064

Paran, A. (2008). The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching: An evidence-based survey. Language Teaching, 41(4), 465–496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800520X

Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B., Gardner, B. G., & Motes, A. (2011). The sociology of storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150106

Rivera, L. A. (2011). Ivies, extracurriculars, and exclusion: Elite employers’ use of educational credentials. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2010.12.001

Small, H. (2013). The value of the humanities. Oxford University Press.

The British Academy. (2020). Qualified for the future: Quantifying demand for arts, humanities and social science skills. The British Academy.

Tomlinson, M. (2012). Graduate employability: A review of conceptual and empirical themes. Higher Education Policy, 25(4), 407–431. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2011.26

Tomlinson, M. (2017). Forms of graduate capital and their relationship to graduate employability. Education + Training, 59(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2016-0090

Trede, F., Macklin, R., & Bridges, D. (2012). Professional identity development: A review of the higher education literature. Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.521237

Tymon, A. (2013). The student perspective on employability. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 841–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.604408

van Kuijk, I., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2018). The effect of reading a short passage of literary fiction on theory of mind: A replication of Kidd and Castano (2013). Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.117