A critical discourse analysis of ideology-loaded eco-sustainability in Saudi News reports
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines how the environmental ideology embedded in ecol-sustainability discourse is reproduced in news reports. It analyzes 43 reports from Saudi newspapers and the Saudi Press Agency using van Dijk’s socio‑cognitive framework of Critical Discourse Analysis, complemented by insights from ecolinguistics. The reports are examined at macro‑structural and micro‑linguistic levels to identify discursive strategies and linguistic choices through which journalists reproduce three key environmental principles incorporated in the Saudi Vision 2030: anthropocentric sustainability, environmental protection as a moral and implicitly religious duty, and the State as the primary guardian of environmental protection. The findings indicate that headlines and leads frequently construct the State as the main initiator and driver of environmental action, while other participants predominantly appear as supporting and enacting this vision. The campaign slogan “Your Impact Is Green” links individual responsibility to state leadership and frames citizens’ actions as part of a wider national project grounded in moral and religious accountability. At the syntactic level, material processes commonly cast government officials and institutions as principal actors in environmental protection, and their evaluative statements are foregrounded in prominent positions. The reports also repeatedly use the phrase “natural resources” for soil, air, water and ecosystems, associating their protection with human welfare and economic development. Overall, the analysis suggests that the coverage promotes a mainly anthropocentric and state‑centric environmental discourse that legitimizes state leadership in environmental protection and presents the environmental principles of Vision 2030 as a taken‑for‑granted framework for imagining sustainability.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Almaghlouth, S. (2022). Environmental sustainability in the online media discourses of Saudi Arabia: A corpus-based study of keyness, intertextuality, and interdiscursivity. Plos one, 17(11), e0277253.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold London.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse (Vol. 270). Routledge London.
Fairclough, N. (2013a). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013b). Language and power. Routledge.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse as Social Interaction, 2, 258.
Jabeen, I. (2024). The Portrayal of Environmental Concerns: An Ecolinguistic Analysis of Media Discourse. World Journal of English Language, 14, 13. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n5p13
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Narin, T., Durusoy, İ., & Gürses, F. (2025). A critical discourse analysis of news on forest resources in Turkish newspapers [Original Research]. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, Volume 8 - 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1575393
Rogers, R. (2004). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. In An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 31-48). Routledge.
Sadiq, U., Alam, R., & Rehman, A. A. U. (2025). Ecolinguistic analysis of environmental discourse in Pakistani print and digital media. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 3495-3505.
Saudi Vision 2030. (2016). Saudi Vision 2030. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/media/rc0b5oy1/saudi_vision203.pdf
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.
Stibbe, A. (2017). Critical discourse analysis and ecology. In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 497-509). Routledge.
Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics as a transdisciplinary movement and a way of life. Crossing borders, making connections: Interdisciplinarity in linguistics, 71-88.
van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Structures of news in the press. Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication, 10, 69.
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News analysis. Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New Jersey: Lawrence, 226-233.
van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Power and the news media.
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism (Vol. 6). Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006a). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359-383.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006b). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006c). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (2011a). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction.
van Dijk, T. A. (2011b). Discourse, knowledge, power and politics: Towards critical epistemic discourse analysis. In H. Christopher (Ed.), Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition (pp. 27-64). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/doi:10.1075/dapsac.43.03van
van Dijk, T. A. (2013). News as discourse. Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. The handbook of discourse analysis, 466-485.
van Leeuwen, T. (2013). The representation of social actors. In Texts and practices (pp. 32-70). Routledge.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 1, 63-94.
Wodak, R. (2009). Discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, R. (2015). Critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 3, 1-14.
Wodak, R., & Busch, B. (2004). Approaches to media texts. The Sage handbook of media studies, 105-123.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies. sage.
Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M. (2016). The discourse-historical approach. In Methods of critical discourse analysis (Vol. 1, pp. 63-94).