Designing dialogic fiction writing through local Folklore in Indonesian junior high schools
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines how a local folklore module supports the design of dialogic fiction-writing tasks in multilingual classrooms with uneven technological access. A design-based project involved 168 Grade VIII students and six Indonesian-language teachers in six public junior high schools in Brebes Regency, Indonesia. Development comprised prototyping, classroom implementation, and reflection with redesign. The module combined narrative comprehension, conflict mapping, characterization, dialogue construction, drafting, and collaborative revision through print-compatible and locally available digital media. Evidence comprised student texts, aggregate rubric scores, classroom observations, teacher interviews and group reflection, field notes, and module documentation. The reported mean total writing score rose from 8.9/20 to 16.6/20, while the dialogue mean rose from 1.7/5 to 4.0/5. Close reading distinguished dialogue affirming shared belonging from dialogue challenging a community figure through Javanese expression. Teacher feedback informed clearer dialogue guidance, modular lesson units, and explanations of unfamiliar local idioms. Uneven group participation and differences in cultural familiarity qualified the assumption that local material is equally accessible to all students. Without a comparison group and documented scoring reliability, score changes remain descriptive. The study proposes inclusive localization as a provisional design principle connecting cultural resources, explicit writing instruction, media flexibility, and linguistic support for classroom repertoires.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Ambayon, C. M. (2020). Modular-based approach and students’ achievement in literature. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 8(3), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.3p.32
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Aryana, S., Zulaeha, I., Pristiwati, R., & Haryadi. (2024). Writing assessment model: Demands of Indonesian teachers in the 21st century. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(3), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1503.09
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carey, M. D., Davidow, S., & Williams, P. (2022). Re-imagining narrative writing and assessment: A post-NAPLAN craft-based rubric for creative writing. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00004-4
Dutta, U., Azad, A. K., & Hussain, S. M. (2022). Counterstorytelling as epistemic justice: Decolonial community-based praxis from the Global South. American Journal of Community Psychology, 69(1–2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12545
Fedorenko, S. V. (2019). Experience of developing students’ multimodal literacy in the digital learning environment of higher education institutions. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 69(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v69i1.2405
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Literacy-Reading-the-Word-and-the-World/Freire-Macedo/p/book/9780710214171
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
Healey, B. (2025). Improving narrative writing by teaching the linguistics of imagination. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 48, 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-025-00078-w
Jumriani, Mutiani, Putra, M. A. H., Syaharuddin, & Abbas, E. W. (2021). The urgency of local wisdom content in social studies learning: Literature review. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 2(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.20527/iis.v2i2.3076
Khomsiyatun, U., Andayani, A., Suwandi, S., & Anindyarini, A. (2026). Developing and validating a digital reading literacy assessment embedded in digital children’s literature textbooks: Evidence from Indonesian elementary schools. International Journal of Language Testing, 16(2), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijlt.2026.580142.1526
Kim, S. J., & Yang, S. J. (2021). Enriching critical literacy through children’s literature: A case study in South Korea. Publishing Research Quarterly, 37, 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-021-09790-0
Loustau, T., & Chu, S. L. (2022). Characterizing the research-practice gap in children’s interactive storytelling systems. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 34, Article 100544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100544
Masie, S. R., Malabar, S., Mulyanto, A., & Lantowa, J. (2025). Development of e-module for learning folklore based on local wisdom. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1), 1565–1577. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.5967
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105642
Mejeh, M., & Sarbach, L. (2025). Co-design: From understanding to prototyping an adaptive learning technology to enhance self-regulated learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30, 1021–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09788-5
Melzi, G., Schick, A. R., & Wuest, C. (2023). Stories beyond books: Teacher storytelling supports children’s literacy skills. Early Education and Development, 34(2), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2021.2024749
Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
Ogata, H., Liang, C., Toyokawa, Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Nakamura, K., Yamauchi, T., … Majumdar, R. (2024). Co-designing data-driven educational technology and practice: Reflections from the Japanese context. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29, 1711–1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09759-w
Olanrewaju, G. S., Adebayo, S. B., Omotosho, A. Y., & Olajide, C. F. (2021). Left behind? The effects of digital gaps on e-learning in rural secondary schools and remote communities across Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, Article 100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100092
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Paivio, A. (1991). Images in mind: The evolution of a theory. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
Rahmawati, F. P., Pamungkas, O. Y., Aziez, S., Nisa’, C., Faizah, U., Hanun, F., … Muharudin, E. (2024). Javanese women in postcolonial prose: Women’s spirit and education. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 12(1), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2023.2012462.3186
Reath Warren, A. (2021). Heteroglossia in mother tongue instruction in Sweden and the development of plurilingual literacies. Pragmatics and Society, 12(1), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18016.rea
Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Stroud, C., & Kerfoot, C. (2021). Decolonizing higher education: Multilingualism, linguistic citizenship and epistemic justice. In Z. Bock & C. Stroud (Eds.), Language and decoloniality in higher education: Reclaiming voices from the South (pp. 19–46). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350049109.ch-002
Sultoni, A., Suwandi, S., Andayani, & Sumarwati. (2023). Representation of ecological wisdom in Banyumas folklore: An ecocritical study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(12), 3141–3148. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1312.11
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/technology
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
Younus, M., Nurmandi, A., Mutiarin, D., Manaf, H. A., Prianto, A. L., & Rahmawati, I. Z. (2024). Comparing digital literacy skills gap index: A case from Pakistan and Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 13(3), 516–527. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v13i3.77319