Local identity, counter-conduct, and the cultural politics of labor recruitment in the asahan III hydropower project: A multi-actor ethnographic approach
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the power relations surrounding labor recruitment in the Asahan III Hydropower Project through the lens of local identity, counter-conduct, and the cultural politics of development. The recruitment of local workers became one of the main arenas of social contestation as multiple actors sought to obtain, control, and maintain access to the benefits generated by the project. Development actors attempted to regulate these dynamics through a series of institutional arrangements, techniques, and strategies aimed at directing community behavior and creating a conducive social order. Referring to Michel Foucault’s concept of governmentality, these efforts represent attempts to shape and govern subjects through regulatory mechanisms. However, the target community of regulation was not an empty social space that could be directed uniformly. Various actors mobilized local identity, social networks, and collective actions as forms of counter-conduct to negotiate access and challenge regulatory arrangements.
Using a multi-actor ethnographic approach, this study employed participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation studies involving development actors, village authorities, community organizations, and other stakeholders connected to the project. The findings show that labor recruitment was not merely an administrative process but a culturally and politically contested arena in which competing claims of belonging and legitimacy shaped access to project opportunities. Power relations between development actors and local groups continuously transformed recruitment mechanisms through negotiation, resistance, compromise, and adjustment. This study argues that infrastructure development operates not only as a technical or economic project but also as a cultural and political arena in which governance, local identity, and access are constantly contested and reconfigured.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Aeria, A. (2022). Kroni Politisi-Bisnis dalam Proyek PLTA di Sarawak dan Dampaknya terhadap Lingkungan serta Masyarakat Tempatan. “Dalam Manusia, Alam, dan Masyarakat: Kajian Multidisplin Asia Tenggara”. INSISTPress dan CSEAS Kyoto University.
Amin, M., Humaizi, H., Rahmadani, S., & Yusuf, M. (2022). Political power shift in the house of representative of North Sumatra province, Indonesia: A political communication of post-election. Studies in Media and Communication, 10(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v10i2.5571
Astuti, R. (2013). Ekologi Politik REDD+: Kontestasi Politik, Modal dan Pengetahuan. Wacana Jurnal Tranformasi Sosial, XV (30).
Batubara, B. (2017). Ekologi Politik Air: Akses, Eksklusi dan Resistensi. Jurnal Transformasi Sosial, 35.
Bromley, D. W. (1991). Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Basil Blackwell. Inc.
Cahyono, E. (2017). Undang-Undang Desa, Krisis Agraria dan Masalah Kawasan Pedesaan. IRE.
Carpenter, C. (2020). Subject Formation in Foucault. In Power in Conservation: Environmental Anthropology Beyond Political Ecology. Routledge.
Ferguson, J. (1994). The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press.
Ferguson, J. (1998). Anthropology and Its Evil Twin: “Development” in the Constitution of a Discipline. In International Development and the Social Sciences (pp. 150–175). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520919440-008
Foucalt, M. (1991). “Governmentality”. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and PeterMiller (eds). University of Chicago Press.
Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental Rationality”. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and PeterMiller (eds). University of Chicago Press.
Humaizi, Yusuf, M., & Sinaga, R. S. (2019). The interest pattern of ethnic groups as supporters: A case study of pilkada of Medan city in 2015. Intellectual Discourse, 27(1), 269–283.
Inda, J. X. (2005). Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality and Life Politics. Blackwell Publishing.
Li, T. M. (2012). The will to improve: Perencanaan, kekuasaan, dan pembangunan di Indonesia, terj. Hery Santoso dan Pujo Semedi. Marjinkiri.
Li, T. M., & Semedi, P. (2022). Hidup bersama raksasa: Manusia dan pendudukan perkebunan sawit. Marjin Kiri.
Little, P. E. (2007). Political Ecology as Ethnography: A Theoretical and Methodological Guide. Horizontes Antropológicos, 3(se).
Lubis, Z. B. (2017). Menggantang Asa di Kabut Asap: Fenomena ‘Environmentaliti Friksional’ Pada Kasus Pengendalian Kebakaran Lahan Gambut di Kabupaten Kapuas Kalimantan Tengah [Disertasi]. Universitas Indonesia.
McCarthy, J. F., Jacqueline, A. C. V., & Suraya, A. (2013). Arah Pergerakan Akuisisi dan Penutupan Lahan: Skema-Skema Pengembangan, Pengambilalihan Semu, dan Akuisisi Lahan Atas Nama Lingkungan di Luar Jawa. Jurnal Transformasi Sosial, 30.
McKee, S. C. (2013). Political Conditions and the Electoral Effects of Redistricting. American Politics Research, 41(4), 623–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X12464545
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A Theory of Access*. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
Scott, J. C. (2000). The moral econoomy as an argument and as a fight. MacMillan.
Taufiqurrahman, A., & Windarta, J. (2020). Overview Potensi dan Perkembangan Pemanfaatan Energi Air di Indonesia. Jurnal Energi Baru Dan Terbarukan, 1(3), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.14710/jebt.2020.10036
Tsing, A. L. (2011). An Ethnography of Global Connectio.
Udasmoro, W. (2020). Gerak Kuasa: Politik Wacana, Identitas, dan Ruang/Waktu dalam Bingkai Kajian Budaya dan Media. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.