The impact of motivation on language learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
In every classroom, there are some students who are unmotivated to learn. One school in Basra, South Iraq is no exception. Some students are academically failing and many educators believe that motivation is not the solution. Previous studies have discussed two concepts of motivation that inspire students to learn namely; intrinsic and extrinsic which are used in this study, in addition to several process theories of motivation such as: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Vroom’s theory of expectancy, and the Incentive Theory of Motivation. This study aims at finding out if both forms of motivation, intrinsic and extrinsic, are needed to help EFL students at a school in build their self-confidence which leads to increased participation levels, higher grades, and consequently academic success. The participants are all the students in three sections of Grade 8 (age 13-14 years). Students in the first section were motivated extrinsically using rewards, medals, surprises, praise, and gifts. Students in the second section were motivated intrinsically through using activities, curiosity-aroused tasks, games, plans of actions, and examples from daily life. Students in the third section were motivated intrinsically and extrinsically using medals, rewards, gifts, praise, and surprises as well as activities, curiosity-aroused tasks, games, plans of actions, and examples from daily life. The data results were analyzed quantitatively and were divided into two parts, first and second term data results, and third term data results. The researcher employed a questionnaire to collect data from 70 participants in order to measure their motivation level, confidence level, and participation level in the classroom before the motivation process, during the process, and after it in addition to observing the students participation in the classroom. The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation were evaluated by comparing responses to the questions that were asked in the three terms and by comparing grades of the first, second, and the third test of each student. The questionnaires, observation scores, and test results were data collection methods of the study. Findings revealed that the two concepts of motivation had a considerable impact on the self-confidence of students, participation level, and their academic results and revealed that students who were motivated extrinsically and intrinsically scored better on the reading and writing exams than the students who were only motivated extrinsically. Furthermore, there were several limitations on this study including the small sample size chosen and the undermining of individual factors of students such as backgrounds and critical thinking. As for future expectations, it is recommended to conduct further research studies supplementing this quantitative analysis with qualitative evidence that analyzes issues related to the effects of motivation on self-confidence, participation, and academic success, for example, conducting in-depth interviews with a number of participants.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191-215.
Cameron, J. & Pierce, W. D. (2002). Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation: Resolving the Controversy. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Cañada, R. & Reddington, C. (2006). How does student participation influence student achievement? Language and Literacy Acquisition in the Middle School. The Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development: NYU Training for All Teachers Project. Retrieved from
http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/teachlearn/tfat/research/participation_achievement
Dishman, R. K., Ickes, W. and Morgan, W. P. (1980) Self-motivation and adherence to habitual physical activity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 115–132.
Duncan, T. K., Kemple, K. M., & Smith, T. M. (2000). Reinforcement in Developmentally Appropriate Early Childhood Classrooms. Childhood Education, 76 (4), 194.
Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York: Guilford Press.
Gall, S. N., & Resnick, L. (1998). 3 Help Seeking, Achievement Motivation, and the Social Practice of Intelligence in School. In Strategic Help Seeking: Implications for Learning and Teaching, Karabenick, S. A. (Ed.) (39-57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jonas, P. (1990) Improving self-esteem: a whole school approach. In J. Kenway and S. Willis (1990) Hearts and Minds: Self Esteem and the Schooling of Girls. Sussex: Falmer.
Lawrence, L.D. (2001). Thoughts on Teaching Agriculture. Agricultural and Environmental Education Division of Resource Management. College of Agriculture, Forestry and Consumer Sciences.
Lei, S. A. (2010). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: Evaluating Benefits and Drawbacks from College Instructors' Perspectives. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37 (2), 153- 160.
Lei, S. A., Kuestermeyer, B. N., & Westmeyer, K. A. (2010). Group Composition Affecting Student Interaction and Achievement: Instructors' Perspectives. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37 (4), 317- 325.
Leighton, P. (2010). Self Confidence, Participation and Self-Esteem [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from soculleighton.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/self-confidence-participation-and-self-esteem-9.ppt
Lepper, M.R. & Hodell, M. (1989). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. In C. Ames & R. Ames, Research on Motivation in Education: Goals and Cognitions (Vol 3). New York: Academic Press.
Lepper, M. R., Sethi, A. S., Dialdin, D., & Drake, M. (1996). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Developmental trends and issues. In S. Luthar, J. Burack, D. Cichetti, & J. Weisz (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Perspectives on risk and disorder (23-50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lepper, M. R., & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning "play" into "work" and "work" into "play": 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (257-307). San Diego: Academic Press.
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar. S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184-196. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184
Louden, W., Rohl, M., Barratt-Pugh, C., Brown, C., Cairney, T., Elderfield, J., House, H., Meiers, M., Rivalland, J., & Rowe, K. (2005). Literacy Teaching Practice: Participation. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28 (3), 195- 202.
McInerney, D. M. (2000). Helping Kids Achieve Their Best: Understanding and Using Motivation in the Classroom. St. Leonards, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin.
Murray, A. (2011, Spring). Montessori Elementary Philosophy Reflects Current Motivation Theories. Montessori Life, 23, 22- 33.
Murray, D. (Ed.). (2006). Coming out Asperger: Diagnosis, Disclosure, and Self-Confidence. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Paris, S. G., Byrnes, J. P., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Chapter 8 Constructing Theories, Identities, and Actions of Self-Regulated Learners. In Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives, Zimmerman, B. J. (Ed.) (2nd ed., pp. 253-null13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Petress, K. (2006). An Operational Definition of Class Participation. College Student Journal, 40 (4), 821- 823.
Pratton, J., & Hales, L. W. (1986). The Effects of Active Participation on Student Learning. Journal of Educational Research, 79 (4), 210-215.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67
Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of self determination and self-regulation in education. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: The classroom milieu (13-51). New York: Academic Press.
Saade, R., Nebebe, F. and Mak, T. (2009), "Analyzing the role of motivation: A social context perspective," Journal of Information and Information Technology in Organizations (in press).
Sanacore, J. (2005). Increasing Student Participation in the Language Arts. Intervention in School & Clinic, 41 (2), 99- 104.
Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives, Zimmerman, B. J. (Ed.) (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Characteristics of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. In Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. Retrieved from http://www.education.com/reference/article/characteristics-intrinsic-extrinsic/
Schunk, D. H. & Meece, J. L. (Eds.). (1992). Student Perceptions in the Classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sharp, E. C., Pelletier, L. G., & Lévesque, C. (2006). The Double-edged Sword of Rewards for Participation in Psychology Experiments. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 38 (3), 269- 277.
Sherman, N. W. (2002). Motivation, Attributions and Self-Efficacy in Children. JOPERD--The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 73 (3), 10- 11.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
Tsou, W. (2005). Improving Speaking Skills through Instruction in Oral Classroom Participation. Foreign Language Annals, 38 (1), 46- 55.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Williams, L. M., Hedrick, W. B., & Tuschinski, L. (2008). Motivation: Going beyond Testing to a Lifetime of Reading. Childhood Education, 84 (3), 135- 141.
Wilson, S. (2002). Student Participation and School Culture: A Secondary School Case Study. Australian Journal of Education, 46 (1), 79- 102.
Xie, K., Durrington, V., & Yen, L. L. (2011). Relationship between students’
motivation and their participation in asynchronous online discussions . MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7 (1), 17-29.