Technological mediation and social isolation in Dave Eggers’s The Circle (2013): A Foucauldian perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this essay, I will discuss the relationship between technological mediation and the isolation of humans in the writings of Dave Eggers, paying special attention to The Circle (2013). In his discussion, the author suggests that Dave Eggers addresses the issue of digital culture and the influence that such factors as surveillance, data transparency, and algorithms have on characters' lives. Based on the theories of digital humanities and panopticism, which Michel Foucault described in his book, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1975), this paper explains the role of technology in forming the modern panopticon and producing self-monitored individuals. With the use of textual analysis, this essay demonstrates that the novel not only describes technology as the tool for connecting people but rather the factor that increases their emotional separation, undermines the value of their privacy, and changes them from ordinary humans into performative beings who are motivated by numerical measures of success like likes, rating, and visibility. Also, the paper argues that through his novel, Eggers opposes the notion of connectivity and illustrates how, by fulfilling that ideology, one ends up being more isolated despite constant communication. As such, the paper contributes to the discussion surrounding The Circle by placing it within the context of surveillance capitalism and the construction of the digital self in the contemporary literary conversation.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
Share
References
• Michel Foucault. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1975)
• Shoshana Zuboff. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
• Sherry Turkle. (2017). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
• Bashir, M. (2021). Surveillance and panopticism in the digital age.
• Dai, R. (2025). Revisiting Foucault’s panopticon: AI surveillance and behavioral transformation.
• Farhan, R. N. (2026). Surveillance, simulation, and the fragmented self.
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.
• Kaçar, F., & Aşit, E. (2025). The digital panopticon: Surveillance, privacy, and freedom.
• Volosevici, D. (2025). Surveillance as a socio-technical system.
• Eggers, D. (2013). The Circle. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
• Lyon, D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. Polity Press.
• Turkle, S. (2017). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
• Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
• Nowell, L. S., et al. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods.