The poetics of repair: Cultural practice, ritual and language in Ngugi wa Thiong’o’s Matigari and Yvonne Adhiambo Owuor’s Dust
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the similarities in the deployment of cultural practice, ritual and language to foster the restoration of community in Ngugi wa Thiong’o’s Matigari (1987) and Yvonne Adhiambo Owuor’s Dust (2014). It argues that both novels, despite belonging to different literary generations and adopting different narrative strategies, locate the work of communal repair in the same cultural resources: the reclamation of names, the practice of oral testimony, embodied ritual gesture, multilingual code-switching, ritual engagement with land, and acts of hospitality and shared provision. Working within postcolonial theory, drawing on Frantz Fanon’s account of national culture as material resistance, Wa Thiong’o’s theory of orality and linguistic decolonisation, Homi Bhabha’s concept of hybridity, Gayatri Spivak’s subaltern problematic, and the model of abrogation and appropriation developed by Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin, the article shows that both novels stage cultural practice as a self-generated, community-authored act of restoration that operates independently of, and frequently in defiance of, the postcolonial state. It concludes that this restorative vocabulary, while genuine, remains incomplete and unevenly distributed across each community’s members.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC-SA) license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Anderson, D. M. (2014). Remembering Wagalla: State violence in northern Kenya, 1962 to 1991. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 8(4), 658–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2014.949301
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1989). The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures. Routledge.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth. Grove Press.
Kouakou, J. K. (2023). Exploring the liminal in Matigari: A critique of Ngugi wa Thiong'o's aesthetics of resistance and revolution. Revue Internationale de Linguistique Appliquee, Litterature et Education (RILALE), 6(2).
Maxwell Ugwanyi, D. (2011). Postcolonialism and the politics of resistance: Ngugi wa Thiong'o's Wizard of the Crow. The Journal of Pan African Studies, 4(5), 218–247.
Njovane, T. (2023). Colonial monuments, postcolonial selves: History, trauma and silence in Yvonne Adhiambo Owuor's Dust. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989420933934
Ngugi wa Thiong’o, N. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. James Currey.
Ngugi wa Thiong’o, N. (1987). Matigari. Heinemann.
Owuor, Y. A. (2014). Dust. Granta.
Pandey, P. (2025). Storytelling as protest: Counter narratives from Kenya in Yvonne Adhiambo Owuor's Dust. In C. Muriungi, C. Kebaya, & J. K. M. Siboe (Eds.), Cultural archives of atrocity: Essays on the protest tradition in Kenyan literature, culture and society (pp. 11–31). Routledge.
Raghavan, P. M. S. (2007). Myths crafted and myths created: The use of myth and history in Matigari. In M. Pandurang (Ed.), Ngugi wa Thiong'o: An anthology of recent criticism (pp. 153–163). Pencraft.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.