A semantic analysis of Lubukusu cut and break verbs
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper analyses the separation events, as manifested in the cut and break verbs in Lubukusu. This is done with a particular reference to the intention behind the separation, the instrument used in the disintegrating event and the manner in which the Cutting and Breaking events are expressed in Lubukusu. Video recordings of activities involving separation were compiled and presented to selected Lubukusu native speakers. Discourses on the various types of verbs used to describe the separation of fruits/crops from their trees/plants, separation events involving animals, people and items such as paper and clothes were also recorded. The corpora of the separation events were organized and grouped using the Bohnemeyer elicitation tool. Out of the 100 verbs of Cut and Break that were collected, the study systematically sampled 30 CUT verbs and 20 BREAK verbs. The study shows that meanings of Lubukusu CUT and BREAK verbs can either be constricted or widened contextually to suit the use. The paper contributes to the existing studies on CUT and BREAK verbs, and in the formulation of further cross-linguistic generalizations on this topic.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC-SA) license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
How to Cite
References
Agyepong, D. P. (2015) Culture specific Cut and Break videos. Unpublished video clips.
Agyepong, D. P. (2017). Cutting and Breaking Events in Akan. PhD Thesis. University of Cape Town.
Ameka, F., and Essegbey, J. (2007). Cut and break verbs in Ewe and the causative alternation construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 18 (2), 241-250.
Boroditsky, L., Gaby, A., & Levinson, S. C. 2007. Time in space. In A. Majid (Ed.), Field manual volume 10 (pp. 59-80). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Bowerman and Penelope B. (2001). Cut and break clips. In Levinson, Stephen C., and N.J. Enfield (eds.), Field Manual 2001, Language and Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Cruse, D. A. 2000. Meaning in Language, an Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Carston, R. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixon, Robert Malcolm Ward (2005). A Semantic Approach to English Grammar, 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gaby, Alice (2007) Describing cutting and breaking events in Kuuk Thaayorre. Cognitive Linguistics 18 (2), 263-272.
Guerssel, K. Hale, M. Laughren, B. Levin, and J. White (1985). A cross linguistic study of transitivity alternations. In Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity, volume 21:2, pages 48–63. CLS, Chicago.
Hale, L. and Keyser J. (1987). A view from the middle. (Lexicon Project Working Papers). MA: Centre for Cognitive Science, MIT Press.
Haspelmath, M. (1993). More on the Typology of Inchoative/Causative Verb Alternations. In Comrie Bernard and Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and Transitivity, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87-120.
Levin, B. (1993) English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995) Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, S. C. (2000) Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav (2011). Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, and R. Marín, (eds.), Subatomic Semantics of Event Predicates, Springer, Dordrecht, 49-70.
Levinson, Stephen (2007). “Cut and break” verbs in Yeli Dyne, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. Cognitive Linguistics, 18 (2), 297-218.
Lewis, M., Paul, G. F., Simons, &Charles, D.F., (Eds). (2016) Ethnoloque: Languages of the world (19thed).
Lupke, Friederike (2007). ‘Smash it again, Sam’: Verbs of cutting and breaking in Jalonke; Cognitive linguistics, 18(2):251-261.
Lwangale, D. W. (2016). A genealogical linguistic implication of Abaluhya Naming System. International Journal of Research and Development Organization, vol.1 (3), 75-90.
Majid Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Miriam Van Staden and James S. Boster (2007). The semantic categories of CUTTING and BREAKING events: a crosslinguistic perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2), 133-152.
Masika, M. (2017) Lexical Variation in spoken Lubukusu in Bungoma-Kenya. MA Thesis.
Mutonyi, N. (2000). Aspects of Bukusu morphology and phonology.Ohio State University,(Columbus) Thesis dissertation; Ohio State University.
Nijme C. J. (2007). ‘He cut-break the rope’: Encoding and categorizing cutting and breaking events in Mandarin. Cognitive Linguistics, 18 (2), 273-286.
Narasimhan, B. (2007) Cutting, breaking, and tearing verbs in Hindi and Tamil. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(2): 195–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.008
Nandelenga, H. S. (2013). Constraint interaction in the syllabic phonology of Lubukusu: An Optimality Theory Account. Doctoral dissertation, Kenyatta University.
Odera, H., Barasa, D., & Alati, A. (2021). Inflectional Forms of Tense in Lutsotso. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(1), 17-28.
Republic of Kenya. 2009. Kenya 2009 population and housing census highlights. Nairobi, Kenya. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.
Sasala, J. M., Mudogo, B., & Barasa, D. (2022). Vital relations in the metaphors of Covid-19 in Lukabaras. LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research, 19(3), 82-100.
Sikuku, J.M. (2011) syntactic patterns of anaphoric relations in Lubukusu: representation and interpretation in a minimalist perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nairobi.
Hopper, Paul and Thompson, Sandra A. (1980). Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language, 56 (2), 251-299.
Sweetser, E. (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, D (2003) and Wilson, D (2004) Relevance and Lexical Pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistica 15.2: 273-291(2003) and UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 16: 343-60
Wilson, D. and Carston R. (2007). A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance Inference and adhoc Concepts.DOI:10.1057/978-1-349-73908-12 (PP.230-259)
Wilkins, D. P. and Hill, D. L. (1995). When ‘GO’ means ‘COME’. Cognitive Linguistics 6(2–3): 209–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.2-3.209