Concomitants of socio-cultural exigencies on narrative preferences in the Kenyan “Riverwood” film
Keywords:
film, Kenya, riverwoodAbstract
In a report commissioned by the World Story Organization in 2008, Justine Edwards points out that storyline lies at the centre of problems that Kenyan films face in trying to “break down the wall preventing Kenyan films from being shown and celebrated beyond Kenyan borders” (2). This paper goes a step further to interrogate this observation through an analysis of three works by three representative Kenyan home grown film makers: Wandahuhu’s Njohera (Forgive Me), Simon Nduti’s Kikulacho (What Bites You) and Simiyu Barasa’s Toto Millionaire. These film makers have made films under the banner of a Kenyan film industry that has come to be informally known as Riverwood—the Kenyan filmindustry associated with Nairobi’s River Road Street where cheaply produced independent home videos are made in mass mainly by Kenyan film makers working with a Kenyan crew and cast. By measuring their works against narrative conventions established in classical cinema, this paper evaluates Kenyan home grown film standards as defined by the narrative choices made by the film makers. In so doing, it is essentially guided by narratological theories developed by the constructivist school of film criticism. Constructivist film theory is founded on the tenet that it is the reader (viewer) of the film text that constructs the story and meanings in the story using the clues that the film maker puts before him or her on the screen. Other relevant theoretical positions are applied as need arises to cater for the multidisciplinary nature of film as an art. The methodology used is textual analysis and interpretation, therefore qualitative in nature.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC-SA) license.
You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Moses Atwoli, John Mugubi, FACET AND IMPORTS OF ORATURE IN FRANCIS IMBUGA’S DRAMA: A STUDY OF AMINATA, THE BURNING OF RAGS AND THE RETURN OF MGOFU , Nairobi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2017)
- John Mugubi, Disposition of the Child within the Family: A Case Study of Caribbean Literature , Nairobi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences: Vol. 1 No. 5 (2017)
- Wangari Mwai, John Mugubi, Pomak Frank Tengya, Reflections of Brecht’s Political Theatre on African Drama: Imbuga’s Successor and Rotimi’s If… in Perspective , Nairobi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences: Vol. 1 No. 10 (2017)
- Robert Wesonga, John Mugubi, Things Fall Apart back to the Owners: Adapting Achebe’s Text to Film for the Igbo Populace , Nairobi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences: Vol. 1 No. 9 (2017)
- Anne Mungai, John Mugubi, Narratives of Rectitude and Extremist Ideology in Selected Kenyan Feature Films , Nairobi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences: Vol. 1 No. 10 (2017)
- Eliud Situma, John Mugubi, Utilization of films as Wellsprings of Succour, Edification and Repose for Psychologically Lacerated Persons: An Exploratory Study , Nairobi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences: Vol. 1 No. 10 (2017)